How To Write a Sign Language, Part 2: Projectional Systems

 

How To Write a Sign Language
Part 2: Projectional Systems

Whether you are new to sign languages or a native signer who has signed your entire life - you probably haven't heard about sign language writing systems. Spoken languages around the world have writing systems so surely sign languages can too? Well, many have been tried and used in brief corners of the world but none have been widely adopted by Deaf communities.

I recommend these resources if you want to learn more about all of those attempts and their histories:
But in this mini-series of posts I want to explain the different types there are so that you, intrepid future sign language writer, may better understand the options and pick which to learn or make.

Last post in this series I talked about logographies. This post I will talk about Projectional Systems.

Part 2: Pojectional Systems             <= You are here

Projectional Systems

The concept of projectional systems is deliciously simple. How should we write sign languages? Why not just draw the hands! As such projectional systems use both simplified drawings of the hands and body, as well as relative positions of said glyphs to create a sign.

Index Finger

Index Finger on the Lips
like the "hush" gesture

Images made with: SignMaker 2017

This opens up both great opportunities and major problems. 

Sign languages are 3D languages. They use space and directions in their vocabulary and grammar. Projectional systems use the 2D space on the page to mimic that 3D spatial / directional grammar.

For instance verbs (like ATTACK) change direction depending on who did what to who; I-ATTACK-YOU will travel from me to you, whereas YOU-ATTACK-ME will travel towards myself.

I-ATTACK-YOU

YOU-ATTACK-ME

images sketched with paint

Sign languages are also visual languages and use iconicity - where signs look like what they mean. In the previous part I discussed how logographies can use this iconicity for their glyphs. Instead projectional writing systems directly depict what the hands are doing, which often capture that same iconicity that is present in the signs.

Image adapted from: ASL: 3D Object by Garrett Bose in Sutton SignWriting

But they are unique amongst world languages. No spoken language writing system works this way. And the fact that they are novel poses issues, as there is no precedent for what such a system would look like if codified nor digitised. 

What does accurate spelling look like if you can use glyphs in any combination, orientation and position on the page? 

How do you even encode such a system for writing digitally?

The two big examples of Projectional writing systems are Sutton Signwriting and the Si5S-SLwrite family of systems.

    Sutton Signwriting

Sutton Signwriting (most often shortened to Signwriting) was developed by Valerie Sutton out of her previous work, Dancewriting, at the request of the University of Copehagen in 1974. As a system it shows signs directly using simplified drawings of the hands, body, face and arrows. It uses shading to indicate some information such as orientation, which is very rare amongst world languages.

Image Source: SignWriting - Wikipedia

Image Source: Sutton SignWriting - Omniglot

Sutton Signwriting found early success back when it was first developed but didn't manage to maintain this momentum in most of the world. It has been adapted to most global sign languages and has found niche use over time. The largest body of use is in Brazil, where it has been adapted by Deaf education and academia. There is a dissertation written and numerous children's books written in LIBRAS using Sutton Signwriting.

Jack and Jill in Sutton Signwriting

Image Source: 2. Sutton SignWriting Notation(SSW) for the nursery rhyme, "Jack and... | Download Scientific Diagram

There has been significant work creating materials for Sutton Signwriting, adapting it to sign languages around the globe as well as making it more digitally compatible. I will talk more about digitisation below.

Image Source: Sutton SignWriting - Omniglot

        Review

Positive: Sutton Signwriting is easy to read individual signs, and even has some longer texts in it. It also undoubtedly occupies a historic place in the development of sign language writing. It is many people's first introduction and intuitively demonstrates yes... maybe this is possible.

Negative: However it is hard to write both on paper (because it requires shading) and digitally (because it requires positioning). I for one believe it would be perfect for a dictionary, perhaps an equivalent to the International Phonetic Alphabet, as it can show how signs are produced. But I am hesitant to adopt it as an every-day writing system.

    Si5S-SLwrite
    (Si5S, ASLwrite, LSQescrite, etc)

The Si5S-SLwrite family has a somewhat storied history. They are similar to Sutton Signwriting in that they use simplified depictions of hands, bodies and movements - but they simplify them even further for ease of writing.

Si5S was initially made by Robert Arnold in a thesis. It was made somewhat as a response to Sutton Signwriting, but with many efficiencies. It even includes some logograms, which are used as a form of shortcut.

Si5S

Image Source: arnold_augustus+ritchie+stecker-2013-official_asl_writing_textbook.pdf

However Si5S, or perhaps more accurately the material used to spread and learn it, was the copyright of Arnold, which was disliked by some learners. Thus they, namely Adrean Clark, made a breakaway open source project named ASLwrite. It took most of the base concepts making it completely free to access. Many of the complications of Si5S were cut down: handshape forms were further simplified and the logograms were cut down.

ASLwrite
Image Sources: ASLwriteSummary.pdfSLwrite

From there ASLwrite has been adapted to other languages. This includes BSLwrite and écritureLSQ. Overall these are sometimes referred to as "SLwrite". Additionally Si5S has been adapted to Japanese Sign Language (nihon-shuwa).

Style wise the entire SLwrite family follows a line-and-dot approach. It avoids standard arrows and shading, which ends up making it easier to write and look more like writing systems of spoken languages.

There have been a number of books teaching both Si5S and ASLwrite - along with a simplified sheet that teaches how to write ASLwrite and a font to write ASLwrite digitally. I will discuss digital compatibility more below.

        Review

Positive: I find ASLwrite in particular to be easy to write by hand. It is my go to when I want to sketch a sign for someone else or jot down a quick note in sign language (except where I now use Icoglyphs).

Negative: It is, however, an absolute bastard to write digitally. Even with the font it isn't quite there yet. With a little more work it could perhaps work.

    Other Examples

Although the above two are the poster children for projectional systems, others exist also. Two separate systems named "Visografia" and "Visagrafía" exist and are projectional. 

Visografia

Image Source: 1 pre textuais

Visografia is an offshoot of Sutton Signwriting. Made primarily for LIBRAS (Brazil) it is intended to have fewer unique glyphs and be easier to read than Sutton Signwriting. This is especially in relation to arrows, which the creator believed Signwriting had too many of.

        Review
I think Visografia only partially succeeds in its goal of simplification of Signwriting. While the handshape glyphs are more predictable, they are also more detailed. Similarly, while there are fewer arrows, more complicated combinations of symbols must be used.

I struggle to break any of this down into positives and negatives, because its simultaneously simpler and more complex. I think perhaps this would've been better as a font of Sutton Signwriting, using the architecture already laid out with that system to make something aesthetically different. 

Visagrafía

Image Source: Aprende Visagrafía

I can't find as much easily available information on Visagrafía. It seems like it was developed for Colombian Sign Language (LSC), but also used for LIBRAS. It seems to perhaps borrow some ideas from Sutton Signwriting and predate Si5S- but mostly it seems to be its own unique system.

        Review
PositiveVisagrafía looks really cool. Its more abstract style looks more realistically like writing than some other projectional systems do (which can sometimes look more like diagrams). This abstraction also seems to add some level of efficiency, as Visagrafía seems to take up less space per glyph than other projectional systems.

Negative: I cannot decode almost anything from these. I can make some guesses, but its much less clear than almost any other projectional system. This seems to lose probably the biggest advantage of either system.

 Digital Compatibility

It's all well and good drawing a little diagram of the hands, but this is the digital age - you need ways for people to write smoothly on the computer. I have placed this into its own section because this is going to get quite technical. 

Sutton Signwriting has had many projects to make it digitally compatible. It has been added to Unicode (The Unicode Standard, Version 17.0) (although this is controversial: SignWriting U+1DA5E + Fill2: who is right? · Issue #5 · notofonts/sign-writing), fonts to display it (Noto Sans SignWriting - Google Fonts), a signmaker tool (SignMaker 2017), a document editor (New Document - Delegs-Editor), ASL Wikipedia (ASL Wikipedia), a character viewer (SignPuddle.com) Despite all of this, the system is still un-weildy and unituative.

As demonstrated in Formal SignWriting these systems often require workarounds to write out the system linearly and then compose the characters.


becomes

Thus the Uniocode characters act more like an ingredients list, with specialist software required to make the "cake" which is the finished sign. This means either that many major websites and apps will need to be adjusted to accommodate it, or a whole parallel architecture would have to be built just for sign language users to access those same services.

While this demonstrates promise, without significant work to make this more user-friendly and accessible it will likely not be adopted by many. 


ASLwrite has a digital font made by Bee Olive: ASLWrite Font Repo – Google Drive

It functions on heavy use of ligatures where combinations of characters produce various ASLwrite shapes:
Additionally it uses overlapping glyphs to produce the spacing:
While technically impressive I find this quite unintuitive to use. I think an onscreen keyboard or stickers for a physical keyboard could go a long way towards making this more intuitive. 

As far as I am aware neither Vis(o/a)grafia systems have any digitisation.

 Conclusions

Projectional systems are fascinating and highly useful in specific situations. I for one find a lot of use in them for jotting down individual signs to show others, and occasionally short sentences. 

However I find them cumbersome to use for longer passages. But plenty of demonstrations show that it is possible, so perhaps this is an issue of practice.

Additionally they are difficult to work with, often unintuitive to use either by hand, digitally or both. This presents a large barrier to entry, and discourages widescale adoption. 


I hope you are enjoying my series so far. If you are then next time I will be talking about alphabets!

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

nasin toki pi luka pona: open

luka pona li seme?

Native Speakers pi toki pona li lon ala lon?